![fritz chess advantage white black fritz chess advantage white black](https://en.chessbase.com/Portals/all/thumbs/072/72089.jpeg)
Otherwise, White will just pound the Kingside. Fritz has to open up the Queenside for counter play. The plan is Black will push b5 eventually.)ġ9…b5 (Just as I expected. I am not sure how Kramnik will make any dent in this position. But I suspect that Kramnik will continue to exploit his Bishop pair by opening up the Kingside.)ġ9.Rd3 (Fritz is doing what it supposed to. Let’s see if the computer can continue mounting strong defenses.ġ8.h5 Ba4 (I do not sense any danger for Fritz. Kramnik is testing the computer again in strategic positions. Kramnik will have a good chance to grind down the computer with a Kingside attack.
![fritz chess advantage white black fritz chess advantage white black](https://images.greenmangaming.com/e955085c4f524e25b427fabc2b2cf1cd/e0397da68d5441c9ad9e5f40fb8f0433.jpg)
"īigsnake101: Thanks but you only make me more jealous !Ĭheetah: Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha ! ! ! Sorry Bigsnake. More than 250 well-annotated example games covering all reasonable replies by the opponent, and all the ideas are well-explained. books, but think this is the best one by far.
#Fritz chess advantage white black how to#
You'll learn a ton about how to analyze a position and what constitutes an advantage and how to play for one. This really is more than just a typical repertoire book.
![fritz chess advantage white black fritz chess advantage white black](https://cdn.cloudflare.steamstatic.com/steam/apps/1279590/ss_1f6bdef02403147496a62d3b7506a4d46f1b87b0.1920x1080.jpg)
is a bit work, since you have to learn lines against all Black's defenses to 1.e4, but still VERY well done. Mickey Adams is the player who plays more of it than anyone else, but much of it came from the reps of Kramnik, Kasparov, Svidler, Grischuk, and Bologan. is basically just a composite of the reps. Kaufman used Fritz, Hiarcs, and Junior to analyze each line and finds improvements in most of them, so that a slightly lower score is likely to be improved upon. The fact that it's still regularly played at the top levels, scores well, and is relatively easy to learn is why Kaufman made it his recommendation. That small difference in scoring is virtually meaningless below the GM level (and barely significant even there). The "best" line (as defined by its popularity at the highest levels and its results) may score 55% and take 100 hours to learn, whereas the "second best" line may score 54.5% but only take 15 hours to learn (usually because it's more forcing and the opponent has fewer viable responses that you must learn lines against). Kaufman's idea is that sometimes "second best" is actually the right choice when there's a small difference in value and a big difference in cost.
![fritz chess advantage white black fritz chess advantage white black](https://es.chessbase.com/Portals/all/thumbs/093/93646.jpeg)
those not necessarily the most popular in recent grandmaster play, but as he shows you, are capable of achieving respectable results without the hugh amount of memorization often required when persuing the latest lines. Kaufman's suggested repertoire is the use of what he terms 'second best' defense variations, i.e. I tend to prefer those chess texts that are more verbose, as opposed to those having reams of unexplained variations. I particularly enjoy his style of writing, which for me is important when deciding whether to purchase a chess text, regardless of the subject matter. here's a review that I wrote on Kaufman's text, at another chess site I belong to : " Hopeing not to sound too boastful, but since delving into Larry's suggested repertoire in this CABW, I've managed to begin winning against more of my opponents' 1.e4 games. ThanksĬheetah: For whatever this may be worth. All this contains are the scores of the game.